<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vote for Free Flattrs!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.flattr.net/2010/09/248voteforfreeflattrs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.flattr.net/2010/09/248voteforfreeflattrs/</link>
	<description>Interviews, case studies, product updates, events we go to…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 10:57:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Southwell</title>
		<link>http://blog.flattr.net/2010/09/248voteforfreeflattrs/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Southwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flattr.net/?p=248#comment-980</guid>
		<description>The idea of free flattery sounds awfully like inflation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of free flattery sounds awfully like inflation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://blog.flattr.net/2010/09/248voteforfreeflattrs/#comment-979</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flattr.net/?p=248#comment-979</guid>
		<description>@Daniel,

To further expand on @agge&#039;s reply, the idea would be that free Flattrs would be funded by this grant/innovation competition award -- and not from users&#039; Means accounts.  So in effect we would be &quot;seeding&quot; the system with extra liquidity or value in order to measure any effects or impact.  Thoughts about how we might do this include increasing the value of flattrs in a month (for free, ie without it &quot;costing&quot; users from their Means accounts) or preloading flattrs into users&#039; accounts without them having to purchase/load up their Means via payment.

What do you think?  If you like the idea, please submit a positive comment to the competition entry page.

Thanks,
Eileen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel,</p>
<p>To further expand on @agge&#8217;s reply, the idea would be that free Flattrs would be funded by this grant/innovation competition award &#8212; and not from users&#8217; Means accounts.  So in effect we would be &#8220;seeding&#8221; the system with extra liquidity or value in order to measure any effects or impact.  Thoughts about how we might do this include increasing the value of flattrs in a month (for free, ie without it &#8220;costing&#8221; users from their Means accounts) or preloading flattrs into users&#8217; accounts without them having to purchase/load up their Means via payment.</p>
<p>What do you think?  If you like the idea, please submit a positive comment to the competition entry page.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Eileen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agge</title>
		<link>http://blog.flattr.net/2010/09/248voteforfreeflattrs/#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator>agge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flattr.net/?p=248#comment-968</guid>
		<description>@Daniel

free flattrs that are yours to give, i.e you&#039;re allocating money with your clicks that you did not put into the system (or earn from flattrs). I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel</p>
<p>free flattrs that are yours to give, i.e you&#8217;re allocating money with your clicks that you did not put into the system (or earn from flattrs). I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

